PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQUD.DE achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than CEB0.DE's 0.72% return.


XQUD.DE

1D
0.47%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
0.63%
6M
1.11%
1Y
-0.35%
3Y*
2.14%
5Y*
10Y*

CEB0.DE

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.92%
1Y
1.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQUD.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CEB0.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQUD.DE
XQUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CEB0.DE
CEB0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CEB0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEB0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQUD.DECEB0.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

1.07

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.00

1.53

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.21

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

1.00

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.82

2.10

-1.29

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the CEB0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQUD.DE and CEB0.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQUD.DECEB0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

1.07

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

2.03

-1.77

Correlation

The correlation between XQUD.DE and CEB0.DE is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Dividend Comparison

XQUD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEB0.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.


Drawdowns

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.01%, which is greater than CEB0.DE's maximum drawdown of -1.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUD.DE and CEB0.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XQUD.DECEB0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-1.83%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.85%

-1.11%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-0.45%

-3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-0.40%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

0.52%

+1.59%

Volatility

XQUD.DE vs. CEB0.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Dist (CEB0.DE) at 0.57%. This indicates that XQUD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEB0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XQUD.DECEB0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

0.57%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.17%

1.02%

+3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.04%

1.51%

+6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.11%

1.96%

+6.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.11%

1.96%

+6.15%