FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE).
FRCK.DE and EMIG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRCK.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. EMIG.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Aug 2, 2019. Both FRCK.DE and EMIG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRCK.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -1.56% | 12.81% | 5.36% | 9.70% | -22.07% | -3.88% | 2.79% | 0.33% |
EMIG.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.24% | -2.91% | 7.57% | 2.80% | -12.35% | 6.34% | -1.01% | 2.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRCK.DE achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than EMIG.DE's 0.24% return.
FRCK.DE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.18%
- 10Y*
- —
EMIG.DE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- -2.36%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRCK.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIG.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FRCK.DE
EMIG.DE
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRCK.DE | EMIG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | -0.10 | +1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.89 | 0.01 | +1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.00 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | -0.12 | +1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | -0.21 | +8.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRCK.DE | EMIG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | -0.10 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.00 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.02 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRCK.DE and EMIG.DE is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FRCK.DE nor EMIG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, which is greater than EMIG.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCK.DE and EMIG.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRCK.DE | EMIG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.71% | -16.46% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.58% | -16.16% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.71% | -16.16% | -16.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -14.44% | +10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -8.07% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 9.69% | -8.62% |
Volatility
FRCK.DE vs. EMIG.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (FRCK.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (EMIG.DE) at 1.66%. This indicates that FRCK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRCK.DE | EMIG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 1.66% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.58% | 21.53% | -17.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.63% | 22.63% | -16.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 12.52% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 12.35% | -3.05% |