FRAMX vs. LTTIX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

FRAMX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A) and LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FRAMX returned 173.41%/yr vs 6.24%/yr for LTTIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRAMX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LTTIX.

Performance

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRAMX achieves a 1,644,791.35% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FRAMX has outperformed LTTIX with an annualized return of 173.41%, while LTTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.

FRAMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1,599,541.56%
• YTD: 1,644,791.35%
• 6M: 1,648,114.72%
• 1Y: 1,734,538.09%
• 3Y*: 2,587.16%
• 5Y*: 609.67%
• 10Y*: 173.41%

LTTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 2.84%
• 1Y: 8.28%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A	1,644,791.35%	9.55%	4.04%	7.80%	-11.87%	2.52%	8.30%	10.28%	-2.05%	6.82%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	17.82%	-3.97%	13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FRAMX and LTTIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.89

The correlation between FRAMX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRAMX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRAMX

FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

LTTIX

LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRAMX	LTTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	2.16	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	548,066.01	3.20	+548,062.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	76,256.04	1.42	+76,254.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	523,251.81	2.47	+523,249.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2,184,998.29	10.68	+2,184,987.61

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRAMX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than LTTIX's maximum drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRAMX and LTTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRAMX	LTTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-19.33%	-14.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.45%	-3.64%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.02%	-5.77%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.31%	-16.92%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.31%	-19.33%	+3.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.45%	+0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-2.68%	-1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	0.84%	-0.02%

Volatility

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) has a higher volatility of 967.30% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that FRAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRAMX	LTTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	967.30%	1.34%	+965.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	967.35%	3.32%	+964.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1,589,373.65%	4.18%	+1,589,369.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	712,204.02%	6.37%	+712,197.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	503,203.49%	7.24%	+503,196.25%

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRAMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRAMX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

FRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.97%, more than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A	102.97%	2.77%	2.77%	2.58%	4.26%	3.31%	2.23%	2.37%	4.40%	8.26%	1.42%	1.42%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRAMX and LTTIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FRAMX and LTTIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FRAMX or LTTIX?

FRAMX has higher volatility (967.30%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRAMX dropped -33.94% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LTTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.