PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRAMX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRAMX achieves a 3.72% return, which is significantly lower than FRQHX's 3.93% return.


FRAMX

1D
0.03%
1M
1.10%
YTD
3.72%
6M
4.14%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
3.92%

FRQHX

1D
0.03%
1M
1.13%
YTD
3.93%
6M
4.39%
1Y
10.45%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
3.72%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%2.98%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.93%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FRAMX and FRQHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FRAMX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRAMX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRAMXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

2.53

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.52

3.74

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.51

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.18

-0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.38

13.57

-1.19

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRAMX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRAMXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.53

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.54

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.80

-0.28

Drawdowns

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRAMX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRAMX and FRQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRAMXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-16.90%

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-3.41%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-5.15%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

-16.90%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-3.79%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.80%

+0.01%

Volatility

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRAMXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.65%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.43%

3.42%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

4.15%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

5.56%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.52%

5.76%

-1.24%

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRAMX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRAMX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than FRQHX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
2.85%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.30%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FRAMX and FRQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRAMX has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to FRQHX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRAMX dropped -33.94% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRAMX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer