FQIPX vs. LTSTX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FQIPX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier) and LTSTX (Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FQIPX returned 10.26%/yr vs 5.50%/yr for LTSTX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FQIPX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTSTX.

Performance

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQIPX achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 5.01% return.

FQIPX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.28%
• 1Y: 26.79%
• 3Y*: 20.19%
• 5Y*: 10.26%
• 10Y*: —

LTSTX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 5.23%
• 1Y: 13.15%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: 5.50%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FQIPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier	11.73%	21.43%	16.55%	19.98%	-18.13%	15.95%	23.50%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	5.01%	12.16%	11.91%	13.30%	-15.23%	10.91%	16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FQIPX and LTSTX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2020	0.96

The correlation between FQIPX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FQIPX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQIPX

FQIPX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FQIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FQIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
FQIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FQIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FQIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LTSTX

LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 52
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQIPX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.00	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	2.89	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.38	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	2.54	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.65	11.45	+2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQIPX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQIPX	LTSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.00	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.60	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.48	+0.54

Drawdowns

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQIPX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQIPX and LTSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQIPX	LTSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.16%	-48.17%	+22.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-5.24%	-3.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-8.12%	-6.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.16%	-21.01%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.17%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-6.16%	+0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.16%	+0.85%

Volatility

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) at 2.06%. This indicates that FQIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQIPX	LTSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.45%	2.06%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	5.41%	+3.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.50%	6.66%	+4.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.37%	9.18%	+5.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.20%	9.82%	+4.38%

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQIPX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FQIPX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

FQIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than LTSTX's 11.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQIPX Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier	1.96%	2.08%	4.09%	2.00%	2.10%	2.05%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTSTX Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund	11.61%	12.19%	9.74%	4.26%	8.00%	7.66%	5.25%	6.91%	6.39%	4.75%	3.65%	8.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQIPX and LTSTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FQIPX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FQIPX or LTSTX?

FQIPX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to LTSTX (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQIPX dropped -26.16% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.