PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQIPX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FQIPX

1D
1.92%
1M
-0.47%
6M
7.09%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.74%

FRQHX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FQIPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier
10.14%21.43%16.55%19.98%-18.13%15.95%23.50%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FQIPX and FRQHX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2020

0.80

The correlation between FQIPX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQIPX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FQIPX
FQIPX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FQIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FQIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier (FQIPX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQIPXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQIPXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQIPXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.24%

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQIPX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FQIPX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FQIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FQIPX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2045 Premier
1.99%2.08%4.09%2.00%2.10%2.05%1.73%0.00%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
2.93%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQIPX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQIPX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer