PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQIFX vs. URINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FQIFX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FQIFX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
-0.79%14.84%8.49%13.88%-16.54%9.52%13.56%19.63%-4.51%15.15%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
0.62%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%8.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQIFX achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly lower than URINX's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, FQIFX has outperformed URINX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while URINX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.47% annualized return.


FQIFX

1D
1.56%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
0.84%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
10.06%
5Y*
4.68%
10Y*
7.38%

URINX

1D
1.07%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
0.62%
6M
2.27%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
5.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FQIFX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FQIFX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQIFX
FQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQIFX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQIFXURINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

1.83

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

2.62

-0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.52

-0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.18

10.91

-2.73

FQIFX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQIFX and URINX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQIFXURINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.83

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.73

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.95

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.11

-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between FQIFX and URINX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FQIFX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

FQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, less than URINX's 6.08% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
4.96%4.92%3.36%2.37%2.64%2.10%2.38%13.76%2.31%1.83%1.88%1.93%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
6.08%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Drawdowns

FQIFX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQIFX drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQIFX and URINX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FQIFXURINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-15.27%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.77%

-4.41%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-15.27%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.66%

-15.27%

-7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-2.81%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-1.93%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.02%

+0.54%

Volatility

FQIFX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) at 2.61%. This indicates that FQIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FQIFXURINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

2.61%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

3.83%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29%

6.07%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.51%

6.23%

+3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.87%

5.79%

+4.08%