FPXI vs. IPOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FPXI (First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FPXI tracks the IPOX International Index while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPXI returned 12.89%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for IPOS. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPXI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.

Performance

FPXI vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPXI achieves a 34.41% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FPXI has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 12.89%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.

FPXI

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 13.37%
• YTD: 34.41%
• 6M: 33.60%
• 1Y: 49.62%
• 3Y*: 27.44%
• 5Y*: 4.04%
• 10Y*: 12.89%

IPOS

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 10.58%
• YTD: 40.15%
• 6M: 44.26%
• 1Y: 65.50%
• 3Y*: 15.28%
• 5Y*: -7.69%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPXI vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF	34.41%	26.37%	12.62%	9.56%	-31.83%	-15.73%	71.50%	33.69%	-13.07%	39.32%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	40.15%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	-33.46%	-30.62%	50.71%	30.93%	-22.33%	36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FPXI and IPOS is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014	0.61

The correlation between FPXI and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPXI vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FPXI	IPOS
Technology	31.4%	42.0%
Industrials	22.6%	15.0%
Basic Materials	14.8%	5.3%
Healthcare	11.9%	16.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	7.1%
Financial Services	5.0%	9.6%
Communication Services	2.5%	0.3%
Energy	2.3%	4.9%
Utilities	0.9%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	4.7%
Real Estate	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

FPXI vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPXI

FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 63
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 64

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 66
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPXI vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FPXI	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.24	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	2.76	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.83	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	11.58	+0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FPXI vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPXI Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPXI and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FPXI	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.24	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	-0.28	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.12	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.09	+0.39

Drawdowns

FPXI vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPXI drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXI and IPOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPXI	IPOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.78%	-73.09%	+17.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.77%	-17.17%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.58%	-34.08%	+13.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.75%	-69.93%	+19.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.78%	-73.09%	+17.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-40.44%	+40.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.26%	-31.99%	+11.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.27%	5.67%	-1.40%

Volatility

FPXI vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) is 8.88%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that FPXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPXI	IPOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	12.05%	-3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.74%	26.45%	-6.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.42%	29.41%	-5.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.57%	27.19%	-5.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.18%	24.13%	-2.95%

FPXI vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPXI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPXI vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than IPOS's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF	0.59%	0.70%	0.93%	0.71%	1.13%	0.71%	0.18%	0.67%	1.75%	0.75%	2.09%	1.34%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.68%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPXI and IPOS in my portfolio?

FPXI and IPOS have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPXI or IPOS?

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to FPXI (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPXI dropped -55.78% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

Which ETF is better, FPXI or IPOS?

On 10-year performance, FPXI leads with 12.89% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, FPXI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, FPXI has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FPXI or IPOS?

Over the 10-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FPXI or IPOS?

FPXI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FPXI or IPOS?

IPOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.59% for FPXI.

What is the main difference between FPXI and IPOS?

FPXI tracks IPOX International Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FPXI and 0.80% for IPOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.