FPX vs. SCHG
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FPX tracks the IPOX-100 U.S. Index while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPX returned 15.44%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
FPX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FPX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.44%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.
FPX
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 39.59%
- 3Y*
- 32.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
FPX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 19.68% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -35.11% | 3.69% | 47.89% | 30.37% | -8.35% | 27.03% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and SCHG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FPX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FPX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPX
SCHG
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
FPX
SCHG
Technology
FPX
SCHG
Industrials
FPX
SCHG
Consumer Cyclical
FPX
SCHG
Financial Services
FPX
SCHG
Communication Services
FPX
SCHG
Consumer Defensive
FPX
SCHG
Energy
FPX
SCHG
Real Estate
FPX
SCHG
Basic Materials
FPX
SCHG
Utilities
FPX
SCHG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
SCHG
FPX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 1.10 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | 3.58 | +6.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -34.59% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -16.41% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -23.39% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | -34.59% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | -34.59% | -8.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -6.46% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -5.20% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 5.02% | -1.17% |
Volatility
FPX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 5.91% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.03% | 12.52% | +5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.36% | 16.24% | +8.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 22.38% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 21.58% | +2.81% |
FPX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.48% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPX has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 15.44% for FPX. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 15.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.04% for SCHG.
FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPX and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer