PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 19.68% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, FPX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.44%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.65% annualized return.


FPX

1D
-3.29%
1M
3.59%
YTD
19.68%
6M
15.47%
1Y
39.59%
3Y*
32.36%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
15.44%

SCHG

1D
-1.37%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
1.35%
6M
0.09%
1Y
17.91%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
13.27%
10Y*
18.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
19.68%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%30.37%-8.35%27.03%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
1.35%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FPX and SCHG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009

0.84

The correlation between FPX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPX
SCHG

Healthcare

22.5%
8.4%

Technology

20.6%
46.7%

Industrials

12.7%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
12.4%

Financial Services

8.8%
6.6%

Communication Services

7.8%
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
1.6%

Energy

3.9%
0.7%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.5%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.3%

Utilities

2.0%
0.4%

Healthcare

FPX
22.5%
SCHG
8.4%

Technology

FPX
20.6%
SCHG
46.7%

Industrials

FPX
12.7%
SCHG
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FPX
8.8%
SCHG
12.4%

Financial Services

FPX
8.8%
SCHG
6.6%

Communication Services

FPX
7.8%
SCHG
15.3%

Consumer Defensive

FPX
3.9%
SCHG
1.6%

Energy

FPX
3.9%
SCHG
0.7%

Real Estate

FPX
3.9%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

FPX
2.9%
SCHG
1.3%

Utilities

FPX
2.0%
SCHG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPXSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

1.10

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

3.58

+6.73

FPX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.29%

-34.59%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-16.41%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-23.39%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-34.59%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

-34.59%

-8.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-6.46%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-5.20%

-6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

5.02%

-1.17%

Volatility

FPX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.91%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

5.91%

+3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.03%

12.52%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.36%

16.24%

+8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.74%

22.38%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.39%

21.58%

+2.81%

FPX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.48%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPX has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.65% vs 15.44% for FPX. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 15.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.

FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.04% for SCHG.

FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer