PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPX vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPX vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.71% return.


FPX

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.63%
YTD
18.28%
6M
18.02%
1Y
39.24%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
14.65%

CCOR

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-2.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPX vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
18.28%37.62%24.75%22.26%-35.11%3.69%47.89%30.37%-8.35%15.52%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-3.71%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FPX and CCOR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.08

The correlation between FPX and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (3 years) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPX vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPX
CCOR

Technology

29.8%
16.2%

Industrials

20.0%
9.2%

Healthcare

16.1%
10.8%

Communication Services

7.0%
8.7%

Utilities

6.5%
6.3%

Energy

4.4%
7.2%

Real Estate

4.2%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
9.4%

Basic Materials

3.3%
5.1%

Financial Services

3.0%
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
6.8%

Technology

FPX
29.8%
CCOR
16.2%

Industrials

FPX
20.0%
CCOR
9.2%

Healthcare

FPX
16.1%
CCOR
10.8%

Communication Services

FPX
7.0%
CCOR
8.7%

Utilities

FPX
6.5%
CCOR
6.3%

Energy

FPX
4.4%
CCOR
7.2%

Real Estate

FPX
4.2%
CCOR
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FPX
3.5%
CCOR
9.4%

Basic Materials

FPX
3.3%
CCOR
5.1%

Financial Services

FPX
3.0%
CCOR
17.7%

Consumer Defensive

FPX
2.3%
CCOR
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPX vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPX
FPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPX vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPXCCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.87

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

-0.69

+3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.40

-1.59

+11.98

FPX vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPX and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPXCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

-0.87

+2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

-0.23

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.11

+0.45

Drawdowns

FPX vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and CCOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.29%

-22.99%

-33.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-8.75%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-12.31%

-18.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.14%

-22.99%

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-20.03%

+19.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-7.29%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

3.77%

+0.01%

Volatility

FPX vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.78%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

1.78%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.11%

4.96%

+12.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.10%

6.93%

+16.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.49%

11.10%

+15.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.28%

10.75%

+13.53%

FPX vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPX vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than CCOR's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.11%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%0.00%0.00%
FPX
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF
0.49%0.53%0.09%0.27%1.08%0.14%0.28%0.67%0.88%0.68%0.77%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPX and CCOR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

On 5-year performance, FPX leads with 10.31% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FPX has performed better with a 10.31% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.49% for FPX.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 1.09% for CCOR.

FPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPX and CCOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer