PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPAG vs. INKM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FPAG vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FPAG vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FPAG
FPA Global Equity ETF
-1.48%25.17%15.64%29.55%-17.87%2.93%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
2.48%11.86%5.70%10.26%-12.58%1.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPAG achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than INKM's 2.48% return.


FPAG

1D
0.74%
1M
-6.59%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
2.35%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
10Y*

INKM

1D
0.20%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
2.48%
6M
3.39%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
5.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FPAG vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPAG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FPAG vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPAG
FPAG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FPAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPAG Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FPAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPAG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPAG vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPAGINKMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.80

1.95

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.92

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.02

8.53

-1.51

FPAG vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPAG and INKM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPAGINKMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.55

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FPAG and INKM is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FPAG vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

FPAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than INKM's 5.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPAG
FPA Global Equity ETF
1.54%1.99%1.42%1.51%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF
5.01%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%

Drawdowns

FPAG vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPAG drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, roughly equal to the maximum INKM drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPAG and INKM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FPAGINKMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.43%

-28.58%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-5.76%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.53%

-3.21%

-5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-3.73%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

1.30%

+2.07%

Volatility

FPAG vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 2.97%. This indicates that FPAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FPAGINKMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

2.97%

+3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.03%

4.62%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.56%

7.83%

+11.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

8.30%

+11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

9.77%

+9.73%