FPAG vs. GPIQ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FPAG (FPA Global Equity ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FPAG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by FPA, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FPAG returned 19.92% vs 30.14% for GPIQ. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPAG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.

Performance

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPAG achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.52% return.

FPAG

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 7.06%
• 6M: 6.06%
• 1Y: 19.92%
• 3Y*: 20.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIQ

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 14.52%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 30.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF	7.06%	25.17%	15.64%	16.22%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	14.52%	19.77%	23.22%	15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FPAG and GPIQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.74

The correlation between FPAG and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FPAG	GPIQ
Communication Services	16.2%	14.1%
Basic Materials	14.0%	1.0%
Technology	13.8%	58.7%
Healthcare	13.7%	3.6%
Industrials	12.4%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	11.6%
Financial Services	9.7%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	6.4%
Energy	1.3%	0.5%
Utilities	0.2%	1.3%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.1%

Return for Risk

FPAG vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPAG

FPAG Risk / Return Rank: 40
FPAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FPAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FPAG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FPAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FPAG Martin Ratio Rank: 42

GPIQ

GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 70
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPAG	GPIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.00	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	2.65	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	3.18	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.19	13.36	-7.17

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPAG and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPAG drawdown since its inception was -28.43%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPAG and GPIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPAG	GPIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.43%	-21.06%	-7.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.14%	-9.51%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-3.49%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.30%	-2.27%	-4.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	2.26%	+0.96%

Volatility

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) is 5.45%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that FPAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPAG	GPIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	7.77%	-2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.16%	12.48%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.21%	15.16%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.41%	17.86%	+1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.41%	17.86%	+1.55%

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPAG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPAG vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

FPAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than GPIQ's 9.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FPAG FPA Global Equity ETF	1.36%	1.99%	1.42%	1.51%	1.22%
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF	9.63%	9.81%	9.18%	1.74%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPAG and GPIQ in my portfolio?

FPAG and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPAG or GPIQ?

GPIQ has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to FPAG (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPAG dropped -28.43% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

Which ETF is better, FPAG or GPIQ?

On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 30.14% vs 19.92% for FPAG. On fees, GPIQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FPAG has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FPAG or GPIQ?

Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 30.14% return vs 19.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FPAG or GPIQ?

GPIQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FPAG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FPAG or GPIQ?

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.63%, compared with 1.36% for FPAG.

What is the main difference between FPAG and GPIQ?

FPAG is categorized as Global Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: FPA and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FPAG and 0.29% for GPIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.