FPA vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FPA (First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FPA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index while FLKR tracks the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPA returned 13.80%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for FLKR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPA charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

FPA vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPA achieves a 52.71% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 125.43% return.

FPA

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 6.12%
• YTD: 52.71%
• 6M: 53.85%
• 1Y: 72.66%
• 3Y*: 33.38%
• 5Y*: 13.80%
• 10Y*: 11.58%

FLKR

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 22.92%
• YTD: 125.43%
• 6M: 139.24%
• 1Y: 222.34%
• 3Y*: 55.23%
• 5Y*: 20.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPA vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	52.71%	43.16%	3.95%	9.97%	-14.55%	2.98%	13.43%	8.91%	-21.91%	3.33%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	125.43%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FPA and FLKR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.68

The correlation between FPA and FLKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPA vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FPA	FLKR
Industrials	32.7%	14.6%
Technology	25.2%	62.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	6.3%
Financial Services	8.6%	7.5%
Real Estate	6.2%	-
Energy	5.4%	0.7%
Utilities	5.1%	0.3%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	1.4%
Communication Services	2.6%	2.0%
Healthcare	0.8%	2.4%

Return for Risk

FPA vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPA

FPA Risk / Return Rank: 82
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPA vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPA	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	4.80	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	4.38	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.64	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.75	9.72	-4.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.32	33.72	-17.39

FPA vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPA Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPA and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPA vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPA drawdown since its inception was -52.91%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPA and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPA	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.91%	-50.06%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.37%	-23.03%	+7.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.66%	-26.39%	+5.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.38%	-49.51%	+15.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	0.00%	-3.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.46%	-21.99%	+8.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.47%	6.63%	-2.16%

Volatility

FPA vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) is 15.18%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 26.54%. This indicates that FPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPA	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.18%	26.54%	-11.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.18%	42.94%	-17.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.29%	46.77%	-18.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.64%	29.97%	-5.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.73%	28.56%	-5.83%

FPA vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPA vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

FPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than FLKR's 1.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.62%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	3.49%	4.71%	3.40%	3.02%	4.22%	5.12%	1.59%	3.90%	2.81%	3.15%	2.42%	1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPA and FLKR in my portfolio?

FPA and FLKR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPA or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.54%) compared to FPA (15.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPA dropped -52.91% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, FPA or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 20.92% vs 13.80% for FPA. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FPA has been the lower-risk option at 15.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FPA or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 20.92% return vs 13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FPA or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FPA or FLKR?

FPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.62% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between FPA and FLKR?

FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FPA and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.