FOWF vs. IFRA
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds — FOWF tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index while IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 37.92% for IFRA. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOWF charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
FOWF vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA's 14.05% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFRA
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 4.75%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 37.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 14.05% | 15.90% | 0.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and IFRA is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FOWF and IFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
IFRA
FOWF vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 2.63 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.65 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.44 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.58 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 18.27 | -4.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.63 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.63 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum IFRA drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and IFRA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -41.06% | +28.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -8.40% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -0.88% | -2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -5.19% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.11% | +0.51% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) at 5.30%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 5.30% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 10.35% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 14.58% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.83% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 21.41% | -4.42% |
FOWF vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOWF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOWF vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IFRA's 1.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.63% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% |