FOWF vs. COWZ
FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds — FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FOWF returned 37.08% vs 28.28% for COWZ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
FOWF vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOWF achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 5.10% return.
FOWF
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 37.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 28.28%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 8.81% | 29.15% | 0.39% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 5.10% | 8.98% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOWF and COWZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FOWF and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOWF vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
FOWF
COWZ
FOWF vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOWF | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.77 | 2.29 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.42 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.41 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 5.66 | -2.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.92 | 16.50 | -2.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOWF | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.77 | 2.29 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.64 | +1.14 |
Drawdowns
FOWF vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOWF drawdown since its inception was -12.29%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOWF and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOWF | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.29% | -38.63% | +26.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -5.00% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -2.62% | -0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -4.85% | +3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.72% | +0.90% |
Volatility
FOWF vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.87%. This indicates that FOWF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOWF | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 2.87% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 8.03% | +3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.54% | 12.54% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 17.72% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 20.04% | -3.05% |
FOWF vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FOWF and COWZ have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
FOWF vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
FOWF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than COWZ's 2.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.73% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |