PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOVL vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOVL vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FOVL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOVL vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.00%6.43%22.87%17.72%-9.39%40.14%-13.20%6.22%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-8.05%2.77%-31.23%-4.60%18.15%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FOVL and TLT is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019

-0.15

The correlation between FOVL and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOVL vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOVL

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOVL vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FOVL vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOVLTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

Drawdowns

FOVL vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOVLTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

Volatility

FOVL vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOVLTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

FOVL vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOVL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FOVL vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

FOVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
0.55%1.36%2.08%2.59%3.38%2.80%2.88%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOVL and TLT have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FOVL.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 0.55% for FOVL.

FOVL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. FOVL tracks MSCI USA IMI Focused Value Factor Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FOVL and 0.15% for TLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOVL and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer