FOTO vs. VGT
FOTO (Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FOTO is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOTO charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
FOTO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FOTO
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -13.36%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 22.84%
- YTD
- 24.57%
- 1Y
- 40.37%
- 3Y*
- 28.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.99%
- 10Y*
- 24.83%
FOTO vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | -15.47% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | -1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOTO and VGT is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOTO vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
FOTO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGT
FOTO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF (FOTO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOTO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOTO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOTO drawdown since its inception was -28.53%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTO and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOTO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.53% | -54.63% | +26.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.92% | -6.77% | -16.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.79% | -7.94% | -6.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.65% | — |
Volatility
FOTO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOTO | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.14% | 23.35% | +53.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.14% | 25.69% | +51.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.14% | 24.81% | +52.33% |
FOTO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOTO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOTO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
FOTO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOTO Tuttle Capital Pure Play Photonics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOTO and VGT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FOTO.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for FOTO.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FOTO and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for FOTO and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer