PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOKFX vs. FCGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOKFX achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly higher than FCGSX's 19.52% return.


FOKFX

1D
-3.24%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
20.99%
6M
19.99%
1Y
44.55%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*

FCGSX

1D
-2.31%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
19.52%
6M
17.70%
1Y
47.31%
3Y*
32.25%
5Y*
17.39%
10Y*
24.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
20.99%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
19.52%25.52%38.00%45.97%-32.15%25.13%70.01%17.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FOKFX and FCGSX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FOKFX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOKFX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FCGSX
FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOKFXFCGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.79

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

20.78

-6.07

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOKFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOKFX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOKFX drawdown since its inception was -37.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOKFX and FCGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOKFXFCGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.26%

-38.77%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-10.42%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-26.07%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.26%

-38.77%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.48%

-4.01%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-6.94%

-2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

2.40%

+0.78%

Volatility

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a higher volatility of 9.55% compared to Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) at 7.87%. This indicates that FOKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOKFXFCGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

7.87%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

14.92%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

19.03%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.33%

23.87%

-0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.76%

23.32%

+1.44%

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOKFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOKFX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

FOKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than FCGSX's 8.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
8.77%10.48%12.49%3.13%0.61%38.65%31.99%11.06%13.21%10.51%2.44%0.25%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.47%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FOKFX and FCGSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOKFX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to FCGSX (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOKFX dropped -37.26% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOKFX and FCGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer