FOCT vs. APRB
FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
FOCT vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 5.72% return, which is significantly higher than APRB's 4.53% return.
FOCT
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 18.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 4.53%
- 6M
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOCT vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 5.72% | 2.88% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 4.53% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOCT and APRB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOCT vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
FOCT
APRB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FOCT vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOCT | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOCT vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, which is greater than APRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOCT | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -4.59% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -0.45% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -0.71% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility
FOCT vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOCT | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.07% | 5.97% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 5.97% | +5.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.89% | 5.97% | +4.92% |
FOCT vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOCT vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither FOCT nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FOCT and APRB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.
FOCT and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FOCT and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for FOCT and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer