PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APRB vs. FEBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APRB vs. FEBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APRB achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than FEBU's 7.02% return.


APRB

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.41%
YTD
4.77%
6M
4.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEBU

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
7.02%
6M
6.63%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APRB vs. FEBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between APRB and FEBU is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APRB vs. FEBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FEBU
FEBU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FEBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APRB vs. FEBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF (FEBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APRBFEBUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

APRB vs. FEBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APRB vs. FEBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APRB drawdown since its inception was -4.59%, smaller than the maximum FEBU drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APRB and FEBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APRBFEBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-11.73%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-1.66%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-1.89%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

Volatility

APRB vs. FEBU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APRBFEBUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.98%

9.86%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

11.61%

-5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

11.61%

-5.63%

APRB vs. FEBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

APRB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FEBU's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

APRB vs. FEBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither APRB nor FEBU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, APRB and FEBU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FEBU.

APRB and FEBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for APRB and 0.74% for FEBU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APRB and FEBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer