PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNX vs. TUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNX vs. TUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNX achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than TUSA's 6.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FNX has outperformed TUSA with an annualized return of 11.90%, while TUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.75% annualized return.


FNX

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.71%
YTD
11.81%
6M
11.61%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
11.90%

TUSA

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.72%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNX vs. TUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
11.81%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%16.04%26.97%-11.23%17.66%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
6.54%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FNX and TUSA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.69

The correlation between FNX and TUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNX vs. TUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNX
TUSA

Industrials

19.3%
19.8%

Financial Services

18.6%
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
16.0%

Healthcare

10.4%
2.0%

Technology

9.5%
6.1%

Real Estate

8.6%
2.1%

Energy

6.2%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
14.1%

Utilities

2.7%
7.5%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.0%

Industrials

FNX
19.3%
TUSA
19.8%

Financial Services

FNX
18.6%
TUSA
31.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FNX
14.4%
TUSA
16.0%

Healthcare

FNX
10.4%
TUSA
2.0%

Technology

FNX
9.5%
TUSA
6.1%

Real Estate

FNX
8.6%
TUSA
2.1%

Energy

FNX
6.2%
TUSA
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FNX
4.0%
TUSA
4.1%

Basic Materials

FNX
3.1%
TUSA
14.1%

Utilities

FNX
2.7%
TUSA
7.5%

Communication Services

FNX
2.2%
TUSA
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNX vs. TUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNX vs. TUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNXTUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.81

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

7.56

+2.38

FNX vs. TUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the TUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNX and TUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNXTUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.44

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.36

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.54

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.32

+0.10

Drawdowns

FNX vs. TUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, roughly equal to the maximum TUSA drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and TUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNXTUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.11%

-56.53%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-6.57%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.97%

-18.04%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.97%

-23.35%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.95%

-42.47%

-1.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-4.46%

+3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-9.87%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.44%

+0.24%

Volatility

FNX vs. TUSA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) at 3.48%. This indicates that FNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNXTUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.48%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

8.87%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

12.92%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

17.65%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

20.14%

+1.83%

FNX vs. TUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSA's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNX vs. TUSA - Dividend Comparison

FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than TUSA's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.83%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.66%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNX and TUSA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to TUSA (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs TUSA's -56.53%.

On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 11.90% vs 10.75% for TUSA. On fees, FNX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.83% for FNX.

FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.70% for TUSA.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNX and TUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer