FNX vs. IJH
FNX (First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - FNX tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index while IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNX returned 13.03%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for IJH. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
FNX vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FNX having a 15.76% return and IJH slightly higher at 16.41%. Over the past 10 years, FNX has outperformed IJH with an annualized return of 13.03%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively lower 12.13% annualized return.
FNX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- 29.74%
- 3Y*
- 17.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
IJH
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 16.41%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
FNX vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 15.76% | 9.87% | 12.21% | 20.39% | -13.57% | 25.05% | 16.04% | 26.97% | -11.23% | 17.66% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 16.41% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 13.60% | 26.10% | -11.19% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNX and IJH is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FNX and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNX vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNX
IJH
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
FNX
IJH
Industrials
FNX
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
FNX
IJH
Technology
FNX
IJH
Healthcare
FNX
IJH
Real Estate
FNX
IJH
Energy
FNX
IJH
Basic Materials
FNX
IJH
Consumer Defensive
FNX
IJH
Utilities
FNX
IJH
Communication Services
FNX
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNX vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
FNX
IJH
FNX vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNX | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 3.06 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.12 | 11.18 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNX vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNX drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, roughly equal to the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNX and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNX | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.11% | -55.07% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -8.83% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.97% | -24.10% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.97% | -24.10% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.95% | -42.18% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -7.55% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.41% | +0.27% |
Volatility
FNX vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNX | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.57% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 11.75% | -0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 15.87% | +0.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 19.76% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 21.16% | +0.79% |
FNX vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNX vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
FNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than IJH's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNX First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.99% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 1.01% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.07% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FNX and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJH has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to FNX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNX dropped -57.11% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 10-year performance, FNX leads with 13.03% vs 12.13% for IJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FNX has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNX has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 12.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FNX.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.99% for FNX.
FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FNX and 0.05% for IJH.
FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNX and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer