PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNV vs. FN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNV vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly lower than FN's 36.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FNV has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 12.94%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 32.80% annualized return.


FNV

1D
-1.82%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
3.78%
6M
7.92%
1Y
29.43%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
12.94%

FN

1D
0.40%
1M
0.39%
YTD
36.99%
6M
27.02%
1Y
165.46%
3Y*
76.72%
5Y*
45.90%
10Y*
32.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNV vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
3.78%77.81%7.41%-17.96%-0.39%11.57%22.31%48.92%-11.00%35.45%
FN
Fabrinet
36.99%107.06%15.53%48.44%8.23%52.69%19.66%26.37%78.78%-28.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FNV and FN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2010

0.09

The correlation between FNV and FN shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FNV:

$41.49B

FN:

$22.59B

EPS

FNV:

$7.10

FN:

$11.65

PE Ratio

FNV:

30.25

FN:

53.55

PEG Ratio

FNV:

0.63

FN:

2.29

PS Ratio

FNV:

19.71

FN:

5.32

PB Ratio

FNV:

5.10

FN:

9.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

FNV:

$2.10B

FN:

$4.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FNV:

$1.61B

FN:

$509.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

FNV:

$1.96B

FN:

$422.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNV vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV
FNV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNV vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNVFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.36

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

8.10

-6.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

19.43

-16.43

FNV vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV and FN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNVFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.50

-1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.86

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.68

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Drawdowns

FNV vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, smaller than the maximum FN drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and FN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNVFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-70.46%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.40%

-20.55%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-37.47%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.12%

-38.70%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

-51.11%

+13.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.40%

-16.45%

-6.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-22.58%

+8.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.83%

8.55%

+1.28%

Volatility

FNV vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is 12.49%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 25.81%. This indicates that FNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNVFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.49%

25.81%

-13.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.10%

55.79%

-25.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.00%

66.78%

-30.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.35%

53.58%

-23.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

48.27%

-18.09%

Dividends

FNV vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FN
Fabrinet
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.74%0.73%1.22%1.23%0.94%1.10%0.82%0.96%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%

Financials

FNV vs. FN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franco-Nevada Corporation and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
641.09M
1.21B
(FNV) Total Revenue
(FN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FNV vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Franco-Nevada Corporation and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
80.9%
11.9%
Portfolio components
FNV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.42M and revenue of 641.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

FNV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported an operating income of 503.23M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.5%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

FNV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a net income of 462.11M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in a net margin of 72.1%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FNV and FN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (25.81%) compared to FNV (12.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNV dropped -58.76% vs FN's -70.46%.

FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNV and FN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer