PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNV.TO vs. GDXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FNV.TO is traded in CAD, while GDXJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDXJ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV.TO achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's 2.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNV.TO having a 14.98% annualized return and GDXJ not far behind at 14.35%.


FNV.TO

1D
3.31%
1M
6.16%
YTD
14.94%
6M
15.30%
1Y
34.74%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
14.98%

GDXJ

1D
0.89%
1M
2.40%
YTD
2.81%
6M
9.60%
1Y
72.46%
3Y*
49.85%
5Y*
22.21%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corporation
14.94%69.90%16.50%-19.65%6.49%10.56%19.99%41.69%-3.12%26.63%
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.81%159.80%25.61%4.76%-8.44%-21.96%28.19%33.54%-3.48%1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FNV.TO and GDXJ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009

0.71

The correlation between FNV.TO and GDXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV.TO
FNV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FNV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FNV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) and VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNV.TOGDXJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.51

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

1.91

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.55

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.41

6.51

-2.09

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the GDXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV.TO and GDXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNV.TOGDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.51

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.58

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.34

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.11

+0.44

Drawdowns

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.77%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -83.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV.TO and GDXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNV.TOGDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.77%

-83.55%

+35.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.43%

-32.52%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.37%

-32.52%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.81%

-44.36%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.28%

-56.29%

+18.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.79%

-24.64%

+9.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.19%

-53.22%

+41.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.59%

12.76%

-3.17%

Volatility

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) is 10.56%, while VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 15.85%. This indicates that FNV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNV.TOGDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.56%

15.85%

-5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.03%

39.82%

-11.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.76%

48.57%

-13.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.18%

38.28%

-10.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.70%

41.97%

-13.27%

Dividends

FNV.TO vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison

FNV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than GDXJ's 2.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNV.TO
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.67%0.75%1.17%1.25%0.91%0.83%0.86%0.98%1.55%1.12%1.42%1.53%
GDXJ
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.28%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNV.TO and GDXJ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNV.TO and GDXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer