FNV.TO vs. K.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNV.TO or K.TO.
Key characteristics
| FNV.TO | K.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.19% | 86.63% |
| 1Y Return | 6.52% | 107.52% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.15% | 26.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.55% | 23.72% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 13.54% | 19.74% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.19 | 2.86 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.43 | 3.44 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.05 | 1.43 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.14 | 1.26 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.64 | 15.26 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.56% | 6.80% |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.40% | 36.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -47.77% | -95.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -17.42% | -59.95% |
Fundamentals
| FNV.TO | K.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$35.45B | CA$16.91B |
| EPS | -CA$4.20 | CA$0.55 |
| PEG Ratio | 11.81 | -3.90 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$827.24M | CA$3.42B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$536.70M | CA$938.60M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$711.24M | CA$1.51B |
Correlation
The correlation between FNV.TO and K.TO is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FNV.TO vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FNV.TO achieves a 20.19% return, which is significantly lower than K.TO's 86.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FNV.TO has underperformed K.TO with an annualized return of 13.54%, while K.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.74% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNV.TO vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNV.TO vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison
FNV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, which matches K.TO's 0.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNV.TO Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.81% | 0.93% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.65% | 0.74% | 1.32% | 0.91% | 1.08% | 1.31% | 1.36% | 1.66% |
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.81% | 1.50% | 2.17% | 1.63% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.72% |
Drawdowns
FNV.TO vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNV.TO drawdown since its inception was -47.77%, smaller than the maximum K.TO drawdown of -95.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV.TO and K.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNV.TO vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) is 7.91%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that FNV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than K.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FNV.TO vs. K.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franco-Nevada Corporation and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities