FNLC vs. ICLN
FNLC (The First Bancorp, Inc.) is a stock, while ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, FNLC returned 10.06%/yr vs 10.19%/yr for ICLN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FNLC vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNLC achieves a 36.08% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's 20.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FNLC having a 10.06% annualized return and ICLN not far ahead at 10.19%.
FNLC
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 20.54%
- 6M
- 36.08%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 1Y
- 40.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
ICLN
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -16.96%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 20.04%
- 1Y
- 48.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- -2.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
FNLC vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNLC The First Bancorp, Inc. | 36.08% | 2.28% | 2.49% | -0.50% | -0.40% | 29.22% | -11.50% | 20.16% | 0.24% | -14.72% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 20.04% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 141.82% | 44.36% | -9.03% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNLC and ICLN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2008 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FNLC and ICLN has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNLC vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
FNLC
ICLN
FNLC vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The First Bancorp, Inc. (FNLC) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNLC | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 2.73 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 8.98 | -0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNLC vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNLC drawdown since its inception was -49.41%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNLC and ICLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNLC | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.41% | -87.15% | +37.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -17.67% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.05% | -43.18% | +18.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -57.16% | +27.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.84% | -66.75% | +26.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -46.29% | +44.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.86% | -66.50% | +51.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 5.36% | -0.34% |
Volatility
FNLC vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The First Bancorp, Inc. (FNLC) is 11.25%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that FNLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNLC | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.25% | 13.54% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | 23.92% | -3.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.83% | 29.11% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.62% | 27.79% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.47% | 27.34% | +7.13% |
Dividends
FNLC vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
FNLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than ICLN's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNLC The First Bancorp, Inc. | 4.22% | 5.52% | 5.19% | 4.89% | 4.41% | 4.01% | 4.80% | 3.90% | 4.03% | 3.89% | 2.72% | 3.18% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 0.94% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNLC and ICLN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICLN has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to FNLC (11.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNLC dropped -49.41% vs ICLN's -87.15%.
ICLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNLC and ICLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer