PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNLC vs. UMBF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNLC vs. UMBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The First Bancorp, Inc. (FNLC) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNLC achieves a 28.62% return, which is significantly higher than UMBF's 19.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FNLC has underperformed UMBF with an annualized return of 9.38%, while UMBF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.


FNLC

1D
9.02%
1M
15.89%
YTD
28.62%
6M
24.16%
1Y
46.77%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
9.38%

UMBF

1D
2.92%
1M
4.71%
YTD
19.88%
6M
15.01%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
35.85%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNLC vs. UMBF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNLC
The First Bancorp, Inc.
28.62%2.28%2.49%-0.50%-0.40%29.22%-11.50%20.16%0.24%-14.72%
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation
19.88%3.44%37.34%2.21%-19.97%56.04%2.64%14.71%-13.86%-5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FNLC and UMBF is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 1999

0.40

Over the past year, FNLC and UMBF have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

FNLC:

$4.32

UMBF:

$15.48

PE Ratio

FNLC:

7.66

UMBF:

8.85

PEG Ratio

FNLC:

135.78

UMBF:

1.18

PS Ratio

FNLC:

1.60

UMBF:

1.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

FNLC:

$174.04M

UMBF:

$4.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FNLC:

$71.46M

UMBF:

$1.99B

EBITDA (TTM)

FNLC:

$35.48M

UMBF:

$937.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNLC vs. UMBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNLC
FNLC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNLC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FNLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

UMBF
UMBF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
UMBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMBF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
UMBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMBF Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNLC vs. UMBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The First Bancorp, Inc. (FNLC) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNLCUMBFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

2.05

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

4.75

+4.60

FNLC vs. UMBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the UMBF Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNLC and UMBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNLC vs. UMBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNLC drawdown since its inception was -49.41%, smaller than the maximum UMBF drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNLC and UMBF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNLCUMBFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.41%

-52.70%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-18.57%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.05%

-31.80%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

-50.25%

+20.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

-50.25%

+10.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.88%

-17.75%

+2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

8.02%

-3.00%

Volatility

FNLC vs. UMBF - Volatility Comparison

The First Bancorp, Inc. (FNLC) has a higher volatility of 10.29% compared to UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) at 7.10%. This indicates that FNLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNLCUMBFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

7.10%

+3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.66%

18.39%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.62%

27.01%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.73%

33.21%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.48%

33.54%

+0.94%

Dividends

FNLC vs. UMBF - Dividend Comparison

FNLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than UMBF's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNLC
The First Bancorp, Inc.
4.47%5.52%5.19%4.89%4.41%4.01%4.80%3.90%4.03%3.89%2.72%3.18%
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation
1.23%1.42%1.39%1.83%1.78%1.30%1.81%1.76%1.92%1.45%1.28%2.04%

Financials

FNLC vs. UMBF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The First Bancorp, Inc. and UMB Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
39.14M
867.07M
(FNLC) Total Revenue
(UMBF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FNLC vs. UMBF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The First Bancorp, Inc. and UMB Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
FNLC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The First Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 39.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UMBF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UMB Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 867.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FNLC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The First Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.02M and revenue of 39.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.6%.

UMBF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UMB Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 867.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FNLC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The First Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 8.99M and revenue of 39.14M, resulting in a net margin of 23.0%.

UMBF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UMB Financial Corporation reported a net income of 261.44M and revenue of 867.07M, resulting in a net margin of 30.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FNLC and UMBF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNLC has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to UMBF (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNLC dropped -49.41% vs UMBF's -52.70%.

FNLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNLC and UMBF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer