PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNIDX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNIDX achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 26.35% return.


FNIDX

1D
0.89%
1M
4.36%
YTD
11.27%
6M
13.24%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

DCINX

1D
1.10%
1M
9.28%
YTD
26.35%
6M
30.17%
1Y
54.52%
3Y*
29.16%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
11.27%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-14.00%12.96%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
26.35%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FNIDX and DCINX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.92

The correlation between FNIDX and DCINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNIDX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNIDXDCINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.61

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

4.61

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

18.49

-9.36

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNIDX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNIDXDCINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.46

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.92

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.35

+0.15

Drawdowns

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNIDX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum DCINX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNIDX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNIDXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-61.79%

+28.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.91%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-13.74%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.79%

-31.18%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-12.85%

+4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.96%

+0.01%

Volatility

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) is 4.45%, while Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that FNIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNIDXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

5.53%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

13.47%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

15.89%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

15.40%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.53%

+0.02%

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNIDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNIDX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

FNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than DCINX's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.66%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.53%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNIDX and DCINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to FNIDX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNIDX dropped -33.17% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNIDX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer