PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCINX vs. DNAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCINX achieves a 24.97% return, which is significantly higher than DNAVX's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DCINX has outperformed DNAVX with an annualized return of 12.72%, while DNAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.79% annualized return.


DCINX

1D
1.16%
1M
7.70%
YTD
24.97%
6M
28.99%
1Y
52.92%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
12.72%

DNAVX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.12%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
24.97%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%24.40%
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
3.11%5.12%6.13%18.70%-14.02%9.29%1.63%13.99%-8.44%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DCINX and DNAVX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2010

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between DCINX and DNAVX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCINX vs. DNAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DNAVX
DNAVX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
DNAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DNAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCINXDNAVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.44

1.13

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.38

1.62

+2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.21

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.52

2.13

+2.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.19

7.15

+11.04

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCINX Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the DNAVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCINX and DNAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCINXDNAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.44

1.13

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.49

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.45

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.33

+0.01

Drawdowns

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCINX drawdown since its inception was -61.79%, which is greater than DNAVX's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCINX and DNAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCINXDNAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.79%

-17.73%

-44.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-2.13%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.74%

-8.05%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-17.12%

-14.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.28%

-17.73%

-19.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.11%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.85%

-3.88%

-8.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

0.63%

+2.33%

Volatility

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Volatility Comparison

Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) at 1.39%. This indicates that DCINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCINXDNAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

1.39%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

3.54%

+9.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.89%

4.05%

+11.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

8.63%

+6.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

8.42%

+8.11%

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCINX has a 2.92% expense ratio, which is higher than DNAVX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCINX vs. DNAVX - Dividend Comparison

DCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.76%, less than DNAVX's 11.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.76%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
11.21%11.56%0.00%3.41%0.00%0.00%0.75%0.00%2.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCINX and DNAVX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to DNAVX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCINX dropped -61.79% vs DNAVX's -17.73%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCINX and DNAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer