DCINX vs. DAFGX
DCINX (Dunham International Stock Fund) and DAFGX (Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - DCINX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Dunham, while DAFGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Dunham. Over the past 10 years, DCINX returned 13.40%/yr vs 13.33%/yr for DAFGX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCINX charges 2.92%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for DAFGX.
Performance
DCINX vs. DAFGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCINX achieves a 27.12% return, which is significantly higher than DAFGX's 0.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DCINX having a 13.40% annualized return and DAFGX not far behind at 13.33%.
DCINX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 27.12%
- 6M
- 27.16%
- 1Y
- 53.29%
- 3Y*
- 29.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
DAFGX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- -0.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
DCINX vs. DAFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCINX Dunham International Stock Fund | 27.12% | 46.37% | 7.65% | 15.98% | -14.67% | 9.70% | 19.86% | 18.14% | -14.27% | 24.40% |
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.12% | 1.72% | 11.42% | 54.81% | -38.96% | 13.01% | 49.42% | 35.17% | 9.80% | 26.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCINX and DAFGX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011 | 0.64 |
The correlation between DCINX and DAFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCINX vs. DAFGX — Risk / Return Rank
DCINX
DAFGX
DCINX vs. DAFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) and Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCINX | DAFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.02 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.58 | 0.03 | +4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.98 | 0.06 | +17.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCINX vs. DAFGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCINX drawdown since its inception was -61.79%, which is greater than DAFGX's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCINX and DAFGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCINX | DAFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.79% | -47.69% | -14.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -27.70% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.74% | -34.81% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.18% | -47.69% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.28% | -47.69% | +10.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.63% | +15.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.82% | -9.57% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 12.16% | -9.13% |
Volatility
DCINX vs. DAFGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) is 7.12%, while Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund (DAFGX) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that DCINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCINX | DAFGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 8.32% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 16.06% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.01% | 20.10% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 26.31% | -10.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 25.49% | -8.91% |
DCINX vs. DAFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCINX has a 2.92% expense ratio, which is higher than DAFGX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCINX vs. DAFGX - Dividend Comparison
DCINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, less than DAFGX's 16.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAFGX Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund | 16.49% | 16.51% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 8.61% | 2.31% | 3.33% | 8.90% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.58% |
DCINX Dunham International Stock Fund | 8.61% | 10.95% | 13.87% | 3.45% | 3.53% | 15.49% | 1.36% | 1.54% | 6.92% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCINX and DAFGX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAFGX has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to DCINX (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCINX dropped -61.79% vs DAFGX's -47.69%.
DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCINX and DAFGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer