FNIDX vs. DFALX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FNIDX (Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd) and DFALX (DFA Large Cap International Portfolio) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FNIDX returned 6.97%/yr vs 10.45%/yr for DFALX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FNIDX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for DFALX.

Performance

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNIDX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than DFALX's 13.26% return.

FNIDX

• 1D: 2.64%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 4.18%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 1Y: 23.30%
• 3Y*: 14.74%
• 5Y*: 6.97%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.89%

DFALX

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 2.32%
• 6M: 8.00%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 1Y: 28.39%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 10.22%
• ALL TIME*: 6.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFALX DFA Large Cap International Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FNIDX Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNIDX Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd	9.37%	29.80%	5.67%	14.65%	-18.89%	7.65%	12.98%	22.20%	-14.00%	12.96%
DFALX DFA Large Cap International Portfolio	13.26%	33.60%	4.55%	17.88%	-13.04%	12.79%	8.13%	22.05%	-14.15%	12.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FNIDX and DFALX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017	0.95

The correlation between FNIDX and DFALX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FNIDX vs. DFALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNIDX

FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 52
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

DFALX

DFALX Risk / Return Rank: 80
DFALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DFALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DFALX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DFALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DFALX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNIDX	DFALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.89	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.64	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.34	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.58	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.01	10.17	-3.16

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the DFALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNIDX and DFALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNIDX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, smaller than the maximum DFALX drawdown of -59.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNIDX and DFALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNIDX	DFALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.17%	-59.76%	+26.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.36%	-10.70%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.92%	-13.11%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.79%	-27.52%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	0.00%	-2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-11.96%	+3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	2.71%	+0.41%

Volatility

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to DFA Large Cap International Portfolio (DFALX) at 4.22%. This indicates that FNIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNIDX	DFALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	4.22%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.54%	12.39%	+2.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.68%	14.70%	+1.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.14%	15.76%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.65%	15.92%	+0.73%

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNIDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DFALX's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNIDX vs. DFALX - Dividend Comparison

FNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than DFALX's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFALX DFA Large Cap International Portfolio	2.78%	2.89%	3.18%	3.24%	2.86%	3.00%	1.88%	2.88%	3.07%	2.55%	2.89%	2.94%
FNIDX Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd	2.57%	2.81%	2.34%	2.64%	2.32%	1.93%	1.13%	2.17%	2.28%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNIDX and DFALX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FNIDX and DFALX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNIDX or DFALX?

FNIDX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to DFALX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNIDX dropped -33.17% vs DFALX's -59.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.