PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNIDX vs. FZILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNIDX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly lower than FZILX's 14.05% return.


FNIDX

1D
2.64%
1M
-0.12%
6M
4.18%
YTD
9.37%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.89%

FZILX

1D
2.82%
1M
0.36%
6M
7.76%
YTD
14.05%
1Y
29.53%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
9.37%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-8.24%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
14.05%33.52%5.32%16.28%-15.96%8.19%11.06%21.69%-9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FNIDX and FZILX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.99

The correlation between FNIDX and FZILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNIDX vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNIDXFZILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.51

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

9.35

-2.34

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNIDX and FZILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNIDX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, roughly equal to the maximum FZILX drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNIDX and FZILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNIDXFZILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-34.37%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-11.24%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

-13.47%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.79%

-29.87%

-2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-2.15%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.15%

-6.61%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.01%

+0.11%

Volatility

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) have volatilities of 5.11% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNIDXFZILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.37%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.54%

14.45%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.68%

16.38%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

15.85%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

17.40%

-0.75%

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNIDX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNIDX vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

FNIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than FZILX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.57%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.35%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FNIDX and FZILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FZILX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to FNIDX (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNIDX dropped -33.17% vs FZILX's -34.37%.

FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNIDX and FZILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer