FNGU vs. POWL
FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%), while POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, FNGU returned 25.83% vs 372.00% for POWL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FNGU vs. POWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 177.61% return.
FNGU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -13.99%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- -3.67%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWL
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 177.61%
- 6M
- 162.55%
- 1Y
- 372.00%
- 3Y*
- 146.47%
- 5Y*
- 94.19%
- 10Y*
- 40.56%
FNGU vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 3.96% | 3.02% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 177.61% | 64.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGU and POWL is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.46 |
The correlation between FNGU and POWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGU vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank
FNGU
POWL
FNGU vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGU | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.60 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 11.71 | -11.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 36.97 | -36.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGU vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, smaller than the maximum POWL drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and POWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGU | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.30% | -73.10% | +11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.55% | -30.88% | -28.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.36% | -8.45% | -18.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -36.09% | +13.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.91% | 9.76% | +15.15% |
Volatility
FNGU vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 27.31% compared to Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) at 19.86%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGU | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.31% | 19.86% | +7.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.15% | 44.83% | +5.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.43% | 59.91% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.93% | 64.36% | +15.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.93% | 54.84% | +25.09% |
Dividends
FNGU vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison
FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGU and POWL have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGU has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to POWL (19.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGU dropped -61.30% vs POWL's -73.10%.
POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.03 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGU and POWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer