PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGU vs. GGLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGU vs. GGLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGU vs. GGLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -38.12% return, which is significantly lower than GGLL's -18.90% return.


FNGU

1D
13.84%
1M
-15.01%
YTD
-38.12%
6M
-46.40%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GGLL

1D
10.22%
1M
-16.24%
YTD
-18.90%
6M
28.40%
1Y
186.52%
3Y*
57.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGU vs. GGLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLL's 1.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGU vs. GGLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU
FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GGLL
GGLL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GGLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. GGLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGUGGLLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.23

3.08

-2.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

3.47

-2.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.43

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

4.88

-4.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.71

18.04

-17.33

FNGU vs. GGLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the GGLL Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and GGLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGUGGLLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

3.08

-2.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.75

-1.16

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and GGLL is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FNGU vs. GGLL - Dividend Comparison

FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%.


TTM2025202420232022
FNGU
MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGLL
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares
5.63%4.16%3.29%2.05%0.59%

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. GGLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, which is greater than GGLL's maximum drawdown of -52.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and GGLL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGUGGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.84%

-52.81%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.55%

-38.39%

-21.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.95%

-32.09%

-21.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.77%

-15.49%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.28%

10.38%

+11.90%

Volatility

FNGU vs. GGLL - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) has a higher volatility of 23.48% compared to Direxion Daily GOOGL Bull 2X Shares (GGLL) at 18.25%. This indicates that FNGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGUGGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.48%

18.25%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.72%

39.37%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.61%

60.98%

+16.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.84%

55.13%

+25.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.84%

55.13%

+25.71%