FNGS vs. QCLR
Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR).
FNGS and QCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. QCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both FNGS and QCLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FNGS vs. QCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNGS vs. QCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | -10.61% | 18.64% | 51.99% | 95.24% | -40.32% | 3.88% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | -5.98% | 11.27% | 20.27% | 28.87% | -18.87% | 3.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGS achieves a -10.61% return, which is significantly lower than QCLR's -5.98% return.
FNGS
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- -10.61%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 31.31%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- —
QCLR
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- -5.98%
- 6M
- -5.17%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNGS vs. QCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGS has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNGS vs. QCLR — Risk / Return Rank
FNGS
QCLR
FNGS vs. QCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNGS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.95 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.14 | -0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 4.57 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNGS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.95 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.55 | +0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGS and QCLR is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNGS vs. QCLR - Dividend Comparison
FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.83%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLR Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF | 15.83% | 14.89% | 8.89% | 0.47% | 0.27% | 1.64% |
Drawdowns
FNGS vs. QCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGS drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than QCLR's maximum drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGS and QCLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -21.77% | -27.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -10.22% | -12.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.66% | -8.10% | -9.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.02% | -6.32% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.52% | 2.56% | +4.96% |
Volatility
FNGS vs. QCLR - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Collar 95-110 ETF (QCLR) at 3.93%. This indicates that FNGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNGS | QCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 3.93% | +4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 8.56% | +7.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.04% | 12.08% | +14.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 12.61% | +17.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.34% | 12.61% | +18.73% |