PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNGO vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNGO vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
-25.13%25.49%-6.08%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.84%-26.70%-16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a -25.13% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -35.84% return.


FNGO

1D
8.94%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-25.13%
6M
-30.39%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
51.07%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*

TSLG

1D
9.07%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNGO vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNGO vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGOTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

0.32

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

1.26

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

0.59

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.78

1.27

+0.51

FNGO vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and TSLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGOTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.32

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

-0.44

+0.96

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and TSLG is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FNGO vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%.


Drawdowns

FNGO vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and TSLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGOTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.39%

-82.86%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.73%

-50.92%

+8.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.61%

-67.59%

+29.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.16%

-58.04%

+33.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.00%

23.82%

-8.82%

Volatility

FNGO vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is 15.84%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 22.28%. This indicates that FNGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNGOTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.84%

22.28%

-6.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.38%

59.35%

-28.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.54%

110.61%

-56.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.28%

119.00%

-58.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.91%

119.00%

-57.09%