PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLG vs. PLTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLG vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -28.97% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -63.47% return.


TSLG

1D
2.16%
1M
-11.85%
YTD
-28.97%
6M
-40.18%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTG

1D
-14.03%
1M
-27.19%
YTD
-63.47%
6M
-69.73%
1Y
-50.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLG vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and PLTG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLG vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTG
PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLGPLTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.97

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

-0.67

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

-1.18

+1.72

TSLG vs. PLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the PLTG Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLG and PLTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than PLTG's maximum drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and PLTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLGPLTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-75.18%

-7.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.61%

-75.18%

+20.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.12%

-75.18%

+11.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.75%

-31.87%

-26.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.52%

42.89%

-15.37%

Volatility

TSLG vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) is 26.61%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a volatility of 37.95%. This indicates that TSLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLGPLTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.61%

37.95%

-11.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.16%

79.00%

-22.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

88.64%

102.87%

-14.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

114.81%

105.90%

+8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.81%

105.90%

+8.91%

TSLG vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSLG and PLTG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

TSLG vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, less than PLTG's 49.65% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSLG and PLTG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTG has higher volatility (37.95%) compared to TSLG (26.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLG dropped -82.86% vs PLTG's -75.18%.

On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 14.94% vs -50.52% for PLTG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLG has been the lower-risk option at 26.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 14.94% return vs -50.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG and PLTG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 49.65%, compared with 9.22% for TSLG.

TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLG and PLTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer