FNGO vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNGO (MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - FNGO tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FNGO returned 54.81% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNGO charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

FNGO vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 29.63% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.

FNGO

• 1D: -2.35%
• 1M: 23.13%
• YTD: 29.63%
• 6M: 17.47%
• 1Y: 54.81%
• 3Y*: 62.64%
• 5Y*: 30.44%
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: 201.84%
• YTD: 842.68%
• 6M: 558.01%
• 1Y: 1,215.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGO vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGO MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN	29.63%	52.59%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	842.68%	-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and MVLL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025	0.52

The correlation between FNGO and MVLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGO vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGO	MVLL
Technology	59.9%	66.6%
Communication Services	28.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	-
Financial Services	10.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGO vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO

FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 32
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGO	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	9.23	-7.84
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	4.79	-2.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.63	-0.40
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	25.11	-23.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	52.27	-48.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGO vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGO	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	9.23	-7.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	3.33	-2.66

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGO	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.39%	-59.02%	-19.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.73%	-48.93%	+6.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	0.00%	-2.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-22.42%	-1.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.21%	23.46%	-7.25%

Volatility

FNGO vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is 11.29%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that FNGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGO	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.29%	60.78%	-49.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.58%	96.08%	-65.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.56%	133.11%	-93.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.24%	139.63%	-79.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.54%	139.63%	-78.09%

FNGO vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGO vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGO nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGO and MVLL in my portfolio?

FNGO and MVLL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNGO or MVLL?

MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to FNGO (11.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

Which ETF is better, FNGO or MVLL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs 54.81% for FNGO. On fees, FNGO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FNGO has been the lower-risk option at 11.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNGO or MVLL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs 54.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGO or MVLL?

FNGO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGO or MVLL?

FNGO and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FNGO and MVLL?

FNGO tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGO and 1.50% for MVLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.