PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNGO vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNGO vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGO achieves a 29.63% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return.


FNGO

1D
-2.35%
1M
23.13%
YTD
29.63%
6M
17.47%
1Y
54.81%
3Y*
62.64%
5Y*
30.44%
10Y*

KORU

1D
-2.29%
1M
92.47%
YTD
559.14%
6M
689.29%
1Y
2,160.10%
3Y*
132.56%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGO vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
29.63%25.49%101.65%240.10%-71.55%28.38%238.00%79.61%-40.52%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
559.14%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-31.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGO and KORU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.54

The correlation between FNGO and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNGO vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNGO
KORU

Technology

59.9%
52.3%

Communication Services

28.8%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
5.8%

Financial Services

10.0%
16.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.8%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Industrials

-

20.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

FNGO
59.9%
KORU
52.3%

Communication Services

FNGO
28.8%
KORU
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FNGO
11.3%
KORU
5.8%

Financial Services

FNGO
10.0%
KORU
16.7%

Basic Materials

FNGO

-

KORU
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

FNGO

-

KORU
1.8%

Energy

FNGO

-

KORU
1.4%

Healthcare

FNGO

-

KORU
3.5%

Industrials

FNGO

-

KORU
20.4%

Real Estate

FNGO

-

KORU

-

Utilities

FNGO

-

KORU
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNGO vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGO
FNGO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FNGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGO Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGO vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNGOKORUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

17.63

-16.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

5.20

-3.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.72

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

35.65

-34.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.39

112.99

-109.60

FNGO vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 17.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGO and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNGOKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

17.63

-16.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.28

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.13

+0.54

Drawdowns

FNGO vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGO drawdown since its inception was -78.39%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGO and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNGOKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.39%

-95.79%

+17.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.73%

-61.39%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.64%

-73.71%

+26.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.39%

-93.35%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-95.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-5.39%

+2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.91%

-57.53%

+33.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.21%

19.33%

-3.12%

Volatility

FNGO vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN (FNGO) is 11.29%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that FNGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNGOKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.29%

60.18%

-48.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.58%

110.71%

-80.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.56%

124.15%

-84.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.24%

85.11%

-24.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.54%

79.91%

-18.37%

FNGO vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNGO vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

FNGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KORU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNGO
MicroSectors FANG+ Index 2X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.14%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNGO and KORU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to FNGO (11.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGO dropped -78.39% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 5-year performance, FNGO leads with 30.44% vs 23.42% for KORU. On fees, FNGO is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FNGO has been the lower-risk option at 11.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNGO has performed better with a 30.44% return vs 23.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNGO is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for FNGO.

FNGO tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (+200%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGO and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNGO and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer