FNGD vs. XDSQ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).

FNGD and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGD is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index (-300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.

Performance

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	33.64%	-61.42%	-76.57%	-90.14%	52.21%	-45.91%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	-4.22%	14.22%	23.12%	23.00%	-16.78%	12.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a 33.64% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's -4.22% return.

FNGD

• 1D: -4.70%
• 1M: 8.14%
• YTD: 33.64%
• 6M: 37.83%
• 1Y: -59.80%
• 3Y*: -66.39%
• 5Y*: -60.34%
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: -4.22%
• 6M: -0.33%
• 1Y: 14.44%
• 3Y*: 14.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

FNGD

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN

XDSQ

Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF

Return for Risk

FNGD vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD

FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 2
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 47
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGD	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	0.81	-1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	1.27	-2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.21	-0.34
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	1.21	-1.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	5.87	-6.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGD Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGD and XDSQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGD	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.76	0.81	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.75	0.61	-1.36

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and XDSQ is -0.78. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGD nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGD	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-26.06%	-73.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.53%	-12.18%	-70.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-6.46%	-93.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.98%	-5.08%	-81.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.98%	2.50%	+69.48%

Volatility

FNGD vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) has a higher volatility of 25.08% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.68%. This indicates that FNGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGD	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.08%	5.68%	+19.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.50%	9.63%	+35.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	78.77%	17.99%	+60.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.87%	15.32%	+73.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.50%	15.32%	+76.18%