FNGD vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGD is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. FNGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

FNGD vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -27.13% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.

FNGD

• 1D: 7.44%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: -27.13%
• 6M: -23.35%
• 1Y: -49.41%
• 3Y*: -65.49%
• 5Y*: -62.47%
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGD vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-27.13%	2.73%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FNGD and LINT is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.40

FNGD vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNGD	LINT
Technology	63.4%	100.0%
Communication Services	26.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	-
Financial Services	10.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNGD vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGD

FNGD Risk / Return Rank: 3
FNGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FNGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGD vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNGD	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.76	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	—	—

Drawdowns

FNGD vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGD	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-100.00%	-49.54%	-50.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-100.00%	-12.86%	-87.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.30%	-20.48%	-66.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FNGD	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.50%	168.83%	-103.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.67%	168.83%	-79.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.30%	168.83%	-77.53%

FNGD vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNGD vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNGD and LINT in my portfolio?

FNGD and LINT have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FNGD or LINT?

On fees, FNGD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNGD or LINT?

FNGD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNGD or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for FNGD.

What is the main difference between FNGD and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.97% for LINT.