FNGD vs. LINT
FNGD (MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGD is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FNGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
FNGD vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGD achieves a -34.80% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.
FNGD
- 1D
- -5.03%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- 6M
- -39.93%
- YTD
- -34.80%
- 1Y
- -48.33%
- 3Y*
- -64.85%
- 5Y*
- -63.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.95%
LINT
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -47.53%
- 6M
- 154.25%
- YTD
- 259.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.50M | $14.88M | $20.27M | |
| $19.47M | $20.67M | $35.74M |
FNGD vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -34.80% | 2.73% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 259.95% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGD and LINT is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.41 |
FNGD vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNGD
LINT
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FNGD
LINT
Communication Services
FNGD
LINT
-
Consumer Cyclical
FNGD
LINT
-
Financial Services
FNGD
LINT
-
Basic Materials
FNGD
-
LINT
-
Consumer Defensive
FNGD
-
LINT
-
Energy
FNGD
-
LINT
-
Healthcare
FNGD
-
LINT
-
Industrials
FNGD
-
LINT
-
Real Estate
FNGD
-
LINT
-
Utilities
FNGD
-
LINT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGD vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
FNGD
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNGD vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (FNGD) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGD | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGD vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGD drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGD and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGD | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -69.02% | -30.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -62.88% | -37.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.46% | -23.85% | -63.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.26% | — | — |
Volatility
FNGD vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGD | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.81% | 169.51% | -102.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.78% | 169.51% | -79.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.95% | 169.51% | -78.56% |
FNGD vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGD vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
FNGD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FNGD MicroSectors FANG+™ Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.76% | 0.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGD and LINT have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNGD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNGD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.
LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for FNGD.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FNGD and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for FNGD and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer