FNDX vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDX returned 14.32%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for VONG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

FNDX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 2.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.32%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.

FNDX

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 14.46%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 30.72%
• 3Y*: 20.21%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: 14.32%

VONG

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: 2.86%
• 6M: 1.69%
• 1Y: 19.34%
• 3Y*: 22.67%
• 5Y*: 13.99%
• 10Y*: 18.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	14.46%	16.94%	16.77%	18.23%	-6.92%	31.73%	9.12%	28.65%	-7.30%	17.12%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	2.86%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and VONG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.76

The correlation between FNDX and VONG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNDX vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDX	VONG
Technology	19.1%	51.4%
Financial Services	14.1%	5.3%
Healthcare	12.0%	7.1%
Energy	10.3%	0.4%
Communication Services	10.1%	13.2%
Industrials	9.3%	5.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	3.7%	0.3%
Utilities	3.2%	0.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.4%

Return for Risk

FNDX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 37
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDX	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	1.22	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	1.70	+2.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.22	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.09	1.20	+3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.73	3.96	+15.77

FNDX vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDX	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.72%	-32.72%	-5.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.06%	-16.23%	+10.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.30%	-23.27%	+6.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	-32.72%	+13.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.72%	-32.72%	-5.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-5.62%	+4.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-4.88%	+1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	4.90%	-3.34%

Volatility

FNDX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 3.07%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDX	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	5.37%	-2.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.63%	12.35%	-4.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.42%	15.87%	-5.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.22%	21.40%	-6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.51%	20.91%	-3.40%

FNDX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.45%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDX and VONG in my portfolio?

FNDX and VONG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDX or VONG?

VONG has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to FNDX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, FNDX or VONG?

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.24% vs 14.32% for FNDX. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDX or VONG?

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.24% return vs 14.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDX or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDX or VONG?

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

What is the main difference between FNDX and VONG?

FNDX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.