FNDX vs. KWIN
FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - FNDX tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index while KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNDX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
FNDX vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 16.60% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.59% return.
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- YTD
- 16.60%
- 1Y
- 28.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 13.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 16.60% | 3.69% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 1.59% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDX and KWIN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDX vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
FNDX
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNDX vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDX | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDX vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDX | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -1.50% | -36.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.44% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -0.25% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | — | — |
Volatility
FNDX vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDX | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.33% | 4.16% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 4.16% | +10.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 4.16% | +13.28% |
FNDX vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNDX vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDX and KWIN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index, while KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDX and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for FNDX and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer