PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDX vs. AJG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDX vs. AJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDX achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly higher than AJG's -21.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDX has underperformed AJG with an annualized return of 14.26%, while AJG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.35% annualized return.


FNDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.88%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.58%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
14.26%

AJG

1D
-1.59%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
-21.51%
6M
-17.00%
1Y
-40.77%
3Y*
0.32%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
17.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDX vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.57%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-21.51%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%25.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDX and AJG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between FNDX and AJG has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDX vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDX vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNDXAJGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

0.73

+0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

-0.97

+6.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.97

-1.63

+22.59

FNDX vs. AJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.18, which is higher than the AJG Sharpe Ratio of -1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDX and AJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNDXAJGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18

-1.48

+4.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.35

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.47

+0.33

Drawdowns

FNDX vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum AJG drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDX and AJG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDXAJGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.72%

-57.49%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.06%

-42.35%

+36.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-44.40%

+28.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-44.40%

+25.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

-44.40%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-41.36%

+41.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-12.82%

+9.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

26.73%

-25.18%

Volatility

FNDX vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) is 2.25%, while Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that FNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDXAJGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

8.97%

-6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

21.79%

-14.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.22%

27.57%

-17.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.18%

22.84%

-7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

23.02%

-5.52%

Dividends

FNDX vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison

FNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than AJG's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.31%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDX and AJG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (8.97%) compared to FNDX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDX dropped -37.72% vs AJG's -57.49%.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDX and AJG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer