PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNDF vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNDF vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 12.34%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.92% annualized return.


FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
2.91%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
41.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%

NFLX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-14.31%
6M
-15.60%
1Y
-33.72%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
23.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDF vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-14.31%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and NFLX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between FNDF and NFLX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNDF vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDF vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNDFNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.81

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

-0.78

+4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.27

-1.35

+15.61

FNDF vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNDFNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-81.99%

+41.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.60%

-43.35%

+32.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-43.35%

+29.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.56%

-75.95%

+50.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

-75.95%

+35.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-40.01%

+38.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.63%

-24.91%

+17.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

25.19%

-22.35%

Volatility

FNDF vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 5.85%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNDFNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

5.85%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

24.58%

-10.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

33.05%

-17.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

43.09%

-26.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

41.49%

-23.78%

Dividends

FNDF vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNDF and NFLX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to NFLX (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNDF and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer