FNDF vs. GSIHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX).
FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. GSIHX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016.
Performance
FNDF vs. GSIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDF vs. GSIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.05% |
GSIHX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A | 3.72% | 20.43% | 9.35% | 21.60% | -11.36% | 12.01% | 15.36% | 27.15% | -6.38% | 29.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than GSIHX's 3.72% return.
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
GSIHX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- 3.72%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 15.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDF vs. GSIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIHX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. GSIHX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
GSIHX
FNDF vs. GSIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDF | GSIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 1.24 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 1.65 | +1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.26 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 1.76 | +1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 7.16 | +6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDF | GSIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.24 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.70 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.78 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and GSIHX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDF vs. GSIHX - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than GSIHX's 4.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
GSIHX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A | 4.63% | 4.80% | 10.87% | 2.04% | 4.47% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. GSIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than GSIHX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and GSIHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | GSIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -28.79% | -11.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -8.78% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -25.63% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -6.13% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -4.99% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.17% | +0.66% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. GSIHX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) at 4.82%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | GSIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 4.82% | +3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 7.37% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 12.54% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 14.45% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 15.79% | +1.85% |