FNDF vs. SPDW
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW).
FNDF and SPDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. SPDW is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. It was launched on Apr 26, 2007. Both FNDF and SPDW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FNDF or SPDW.
Key characteristics
| FNDF | SPDW | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.85% | 1.73% |
| 1Y Return | 13.28% | 9.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.48% | 1.32% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.49% | 5.89% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.65% | 4.38% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.97 | 0.66 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.40% | 12.57% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.14% | -60.02% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.97% | -3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and SPDW is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FNDF vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than SPDW's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has outperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 4.65%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively lower 4.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDF vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FNDF vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FNDF vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than SPDW's 2.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.32% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 0.48% |
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF | 2.70% | 2.75% | 3.12% | 3.04% | 1.87% | 3.13% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 3.11% | 2.79% | 3.51% | 2.36% |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and SPDW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FNDF vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.