FNDF vs. SPDW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FNDF tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net) while SPDW tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDF returned 11.86%/yr vs 10.02%/yr for SPDW. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FNDF charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.

Performance

FNDF vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 20.14% return, which is significantly higher than SPDW's 14.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has outperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 11.86%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.02% annualized return.

FNDF

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 2.41%
• 6M: 11.85%
• YTD: 20.14%
• 1Y: 40.23%
• 3Y*: 21.76%
• 5Y*: 14.24%
• 10Y*: 11.86%
• ALL TIME*: 9.07%

SPDW

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: 8.06%
• YTD: 14.31%
• 1Y: 29.86%
• 3Y*: 18.18%
• 5Y*: 9.68%
• 10Y*: 10.02%
• ALL TIME*: 5.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	$75.61M	$73.89M	$78.20M
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	$139.26M	$163.06M	$165.12M

FNDF vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	20.14%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	14.31%	34.75%	3.55%	17.81%	-15.98%	11.45%	9.90%	22.41%	-14.22%	25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDF and SPDW is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.97

The correlation between FNDF and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDF vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDF	SPDW
Financial Services	20.2%	18.0%
Industrials	12.8%	10.6%
Technology	11.5%	9.5%
Energy	10.6%	4.9%
Basic Materials	10.0%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.2%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	3.0%
Healthcare	6.0%	6.3%
Utilities	4.3%	1.4%
Communication Services	3.4%	1.8%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FNDF vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 91
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SPDW

SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 76
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNDF vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNDF	SPDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.74	+0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.41	+0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.32	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.78	2.56	+1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.23	9.68	+3.55

FNDF vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDF Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDF and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNDF vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and SPDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDF	SPDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.14%	-60.02%	+19.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.60%	-11.55%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.89%	-13.53%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	-30.21%	+4.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.14%	-34.98%	-5.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-2.11%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-12.82%	+5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	3.05%	-0.03%

Volatility

FNDF vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is 4.54%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that FNDF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDF	SPDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	5.26%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.24%	15.21%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.21%	17.09%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.34%	16.77%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.43%	17.13%	+0.30%

FNDF vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDF vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, which matches SPDW's 3.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	3.03%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	3.03%	3.30%	3.19%	2.75%	3.12%	3.04%	1.87%	3.13%	3.08%	1.86%	3.11%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDF and SPDW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FNDF and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDF or SPDW?

SPDW has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to FNDF (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

Which ETF is better, FNDF or SPDW?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 11.86% vs 10.02% for SPDW. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDF or SPDW?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDF or SPDW?

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDF or SPDW?

FNDF and SPDW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 3.03%.

What is the main difference between FNDF and SPDW?

FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDF and 0.04% for SPDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.