PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GSIHX vs. BUFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GSIHX achieves a 6.32% return, which is significantly lower than BUFIX's 17.99% return.


GSIHX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
6.32%
6M
7.83%
1Y
12.32%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*

BUFIX

1D
0.14%
1M
9.77%
YTD
17.99%
6M
20.64%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GSIHX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A
6.32%20.43%9.35%21.60%-11.36%12.01%15.36%27.15%-6.38%29.41%
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
17.99%17.09%-1.90%18.33%-21.80%18.20%19.10%28.01%-8.85%29.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GSIHX and BUFIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between GSIHX and BUFIX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GSIHX vs. BUFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GSIHX
GSIHX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GSIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFIX
BUFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BUFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) and Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GSIHXBUFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.62

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

5.65

-0.66

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GSIHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the BUFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GSIHX and BUFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GSIHXBUFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.22

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.35

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.34

+0.45

Drawdowns

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GSIHX drawdown since its inception was -28.79%, smaller than the maximum BUFIX drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIHX and BUFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GSIHXBUFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.79%

-55.09%

+26.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-12.85%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.42%

-15.52%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-34.93%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

0.00%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-9.17%

+4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.68%

-1.32%

Volatility

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A (GSIHX) is 2.76%, while Buffalo International Fund (BUFIX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that GSIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GSIHXBUFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

7.04%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.88%

14.72%

-6.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

17.12%

-7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

17.56%

-3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

17.52%

-1.81%

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GSIHX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFIX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GSIHX vs. BUFIX - Dividend Comparison

GSIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than BUFIX's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFIX
Buffalo International Fund
0.72%0.85%0.84%0.59%1.85%1.20%0.28%0.57%2.42%0.36%0.00%0.51%
GSIHX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class A
4.52%4.80%10.87%2.04%4.47%1.90%0.00%0.41%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GSIHX and BUFIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFIX has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to GSIHX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GSIHX dropped -28.79% vs BUFIX's -55.09%.

GSIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GSIHX and BUFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer