FNDF vs. DWMF
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF).
FNDF and DWMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. DWMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018.
Performance
FNDF vs. DWMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDF vs. DWMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -11.48% |
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund | 3.84% | 24.42% | 10.22% | 10.78% | -7.31% | 11.24% | -1.18% | 16.10% | -7.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than DWMF's 3.84% return.
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
DWMF
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDF vs. DWMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DWMF's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. DWMF — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
DWMF
FNDF vs. DWMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDF | DWMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 1.38 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 2.02 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.29 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.13 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 8.12 | +5.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDF | DWMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.38 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.84 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and DWMF is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FNDF vs. DWMF - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than DWMF's 2.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
DWMF WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund | 2.87% | 2.80% | 3.50% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.54% | 2.06% | 2.77% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. DWMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than DWMF's maximum drawdown of -29.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and DWMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | DWMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -29.72% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -8.74% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -17.00% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -5.33% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -3.88% | -3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.29% | +0.54% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. DWMF - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to WisdomTree International Multifactor Fund (DWMF) at 5.84%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | DWMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 5.84% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 8.39% | +3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 13.70% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 11.20% | +4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 14.16% | +3.48% |