FNDF vs. DIS
FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net), while DIS (The Walt Disney Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FNDF returned 12.34%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DIS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FNDF vs. DIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than DIS's -12.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has outperformed DIS with an annualized return of 12.34%, while DIS has yielded a comparatively lower 0.99% annualized return.
FNDF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
DIS
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -12.07%
- 6M
- -9.75%
- 1Y
- -14.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- -10.41%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
FNDF vs. DIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 19.66% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
DIS The Walt Disney Company | -12.07% | 3.30% | 24.44% | 4.26% | -43.91% | -14.51% | 25.27% | 33.51% | 3.61% | 4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and DIS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FNDF and DIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. DIS — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
DIS
FNDF vs. DIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) and The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDF | DIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.91 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | -0.59 | +4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.27 | -1.18 | +15.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. DIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum DIS drawdown of -85.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and DIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | DIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -85.66% | +45.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -24.97% | +14.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -32.86% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -57.33% | +31.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | -60.72% | +20.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -49.29% | +47.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -26.78% | +19.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 12.47% | -9.63% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. DIS - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to The Walt Disney Company (DIS) at 5.56%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | DIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 5.56% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 19.26% | -5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.00% | 24.15% | -8.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 29.33% | -12.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 28.77% | -11.06% |
Dividends
FNDF vs. DIS - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than DIS's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS The Walt Disney Company | 1.25% | 1.10% | 0.85% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.22% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 1.30% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.87% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDF and DIS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to DIS (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDF dropped -40.14% vs DIS's -85.66%.
FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDF and DIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer